Is it an effective alternative to traditional sanctions? Youths serve as jurors. Defendants can be sentenced to serve subsequent jury terms as a form of punishment. The qualifications of the adult vary from state to state, but usually the adult is trained in dealing with youth. Youth courts operate using one of four main case-processing models: Participants also perceived teen court as fair and valuable.
Court of second chances
Researchers analyzed total cases from the four courts. Teen Courts are an effective judicial alternative for many youth offenders. Picture by Rondal Partridge via Wikimedia Commons. The National Academies Press. Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Relatively few studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of these teen courts as an alternative to traditional juvenile jurisdiction. In , the Pima County Juvenile Court stepped to the forefront in dealing with juvenile delinquents.
Pima County Teen Court | Community Tool Box
The majority of youth courts deal solely with first-time offenders. The cost to taxpayers could climb, and an opportunity for many young people to become productive citizens would be lost. Adolescents crave peer acceptance and peer approval. Many courts operate on restorative justice principles, which emphasize repairing harm caused by crime by involving the victim, offender and community. With the help of LSU service-learning students, the experience has been even more dynamic for the teen clients — from appearing before the jury to the completion of the program. He says that prior to his experience with Teen Court, going to college wasn't a priority. But his mother said he should have faced tougher punishment.
Juvenile Justice Bulletin, October, 1 - Juvenile offenders meet their victims. Relatively few studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of these teen courts as an alternative to traditional juvenile jurisdiction. The YMCA provides coordination and sets up training for teens who spend several hours learning court procedure. State-approved teen courts implement restorative justice and attempt to reintegrate the youth offender to the community while sending appropriate messages to the offender regarding unacceptable behavior. The researchers conclude that youth courts appear to be a cost-effective alternative in localities that do not or cannot provide a meaningful response for every young, first-time nonviolent offender.